
Originally Posted by
affy18
I finally saw this (and on the big screen, no less!) and while it doesn't have the overwhelming grandeur and awe-inspiring mise-en-scène of There Will Be Blood, I think The Master, for all its lack of narrative discipline and thematic obscurantism might be an even more insightful and psychologically complex than Anderson's previous film. To me this could be some sort of even thematic and idealogical continuation of the themes explored in There Will Be Blood, except here it's turned inward. While Blood explored religion and materialism as forces fighting for the soul of man, The Master implies the harrowing near-impossibility of free will, such a concept as nothing more than illusory and the (inherent?) need of conceding that free will to a "master". A free man in the modern world as nothing but an illusion and to pursue such a radical freedom as a path to self-destruction. At first I thought this would be an all-too common critique on religious institutions but the tables are turned at the end when Lancaster is shown as subjected to his "cause" as anyone who follows him. He too, is in need of a master, of committing to something; almost bringing to a conclusion that absolute freedom can only lead to madness.
Definitely one of the more complex films of the past year. Phoenix and Hoffman are spectacular.